Can you sue for social media post bashing online?
When a social media user experiences reputation damaged due to a negative comment made on Facebook, Twitter, or through other popular mediums of social media, defamation may become a pursuit they will consider against the offending party. By filing a libel tort lawsuit, they can consider the possible compensation recovery for the damages caused by another against their reputation.
As social media begins to be a cultural norm for how we communicate with others in our personal lives and in business, online commentary sites such as Yelp, Amazon, and other popular sites that allow consumers to voice their views on products and services, multitudes of other consumers are able to read these commentaries. Often, social media websites operate around the notion that internet website users can and should be permitted to share this information. Quite frequently, sharing happens with no forethought to information truthfulness and more importantly absent of any regulations by the website’s staff.
In addition, anonymous site users let consumers post their true thoughts in an instant. They can act in complete anonymity and may act in ways they would not in the physical world outside the internet. Internet reviewers are often given outpouring attention and support when they ridicule others. The vast majority of websites screen only for inappropriate content as far as swear words and sexual content, but often they don’t check for content that is or can become defamatory.
While some victims of defamatory comments hope to pursue online service providers or websites owners hopes of obtaining significant defamation damage awards, federal law(http://www.personalinjurylawyercalgaryinc.ca/) prohibits this activity due to legislation dubbed, the “Communications Decency Act”. Individuals who have been defamed are forced to file claims against the person or entity that lodged the negative statement, which is most commonly done by filing a complaint in the appropriate court according to state.
Defamation Elements Explained
The laws of each state can slightly vary, but basically all defamation lawsuits are quite similar. Generally, defamation is considered to be an untrue statement that is published in physical print or online that causes injury to a victim’s reputation.
A victim has the burden of proving the statement published is untrue. The entire defense rests on the truth in a defamation lawsuit.
Presumed Factual Statements
The defamatory statement allegations must be shown to be not just an opinion, but fact. However, an opinion can sometimes be considered a factual statement if a reasonable person would have considered the statement as such.
The definition of published has changed over the years to include not only when something is literally in physical print such as in a magazine or a newspaper, but also when in electronic print on a website or blog or even when a potentially defamatory statement is made in front of an audience or any third party. Providing evidence that a statement was published is generally pretty easy in the instance of social media, provided that the plaintiff can provide evidence that the content was present on the webpage in digital print. The content is considered published no matter how many people have read it whether it’s just a couple, thousands, or millions who viewed it on a social media page.
For a plaintiff to be victorious in a defamation lawsuit, they must be able to provide sufficient evidence that the defamatory statement damaged them in some significant way. It must be shown that the damage was vital, quantifiable, and documented. This is generally done by providing evidence that the victim’s reputation has been damaged. If the defamed was insulted online and was a business owner, damages may be evident by the loss of profit.
Some statements are so obviously injurious to a victim that they may not even need to depict actual damages. Some examples are statements accusing the offended of being a criminal, incompetent in their job, or accusing the individual of sexual conduct or of being infected with a disease. A popular test in figuring out if an individuals reputation has been damaged is if the statement would tarnish the opinion of the individual among their peers.
Social Media Defamation – Examples
Though not all mean or or unkind statements allow a consumer to take legal action, many statements are. To provide an example, if a person is accused on social media of abusing his partner or kids, this type of statement would almost certainly be seen as defamatory if it were a lie. Even in an instance where a person posts statements that are only true in part, he or she can be deemed liable for defamation. Another prime example is when a person claims an individual was fired from a job for harassment. Just because the individual was fired does not necessarily mean it was for harassment so this is a lie. The court may judge defamation was still existent even if the statement was partially true.
Personal Injury Lawyer Calgary Inc
421 7 Avenue Southwest #4900
Calgary, AB T2P 4K9